No crime in American history-- let alone a crime that
never
occurred-- produced as many trials, convictions, reversals, and
retrials
as did an alleged gang rape of two white girls by nine black teenagers
on a Southern Railroad freight run on March 25, 1931. Over the
course
of the two decades that followed, the struggle for justice of the
"Scottsboro
Boys," as the black teens were called, made celebrities out of
anonymities,
launched and ended careers, wasted lives, produced heroes, opened
southern
juries to blacks, exacerbated sectional strife, and divided America's
political
left.
Hoboing was a common pastime in the Depression year of
1931.
For some, riding freights was an appealing adventure compared to the
drudgery
and dreariness of their daily lives. Others hopped rail cars to
move
from one fruitless job search to the next. Two dozen or so
mainly male--and mainly young--whites and blacks rode the Southern
Railroad's
Chattanooga to Memphis freight on March 25, 1931. Among them were four
black Chattanooga teenagers hoping to investigate a rumor of government
jobs in Memphis hauling logs on the river and five other black teens
from
various parts of Georgia. Four young whites, two males and
two females dressed in overalls, also rode the train, returning to
Huntsville
from unsuccessful job searches in the cotton mills of
Chattanooga. (LINK
TO DIAGRAM OF TRAIN).
Soon after the train crossed the Alabama border, a white
youth walked
across the top of a tank car. He stepped on the hand of a black
youth
named Haywood
Patterson, who was hanging on to its side. Patterson had
friends
aboard the train. A stone-throwing fight erupted between white
youths
and a larger group of black youths. Eventually, the blacks
succeeded
in forcing all but one of the members of the white gang off the
train.
Patterson pulled the one remaining white youth, Orville
Gilley, back onto the train after it had accelerated to a
life-endangering
speed. Some of the whites forced off the train went to the
stationmaster
in Stevenson to report what they described as an assault by a gang
of
blacks. The stationmaster wired ahead. A posse in Paint Rock,
Alabama
stopped the train. (LINK
TO MAP OF NORTHERN ALABAMA). Dozens of men with guns rushed
at the train as it ground to a halt. The armed men rounded up
every
black youth they could find. Nine captured blacks, soon to be
called
"The
Scottsboro Boys," were tied together with plow line, loaded on a
flat back
truck, and taken to a jail in Scottsboro.
Also greeted by the posse in Paint Rock were two
mill workers from
Huntsville, Victoria
Price and Ruby
Bates. One or the other of the girls, either in response to a
question or on their own initiative, told one of the posse members that
they had been raped by a gang of twelve blacks with pistols and
knives.
In the jail that March 25th, Price pointed out six of the nine boys and
said that they were the ones who raped her. The guard reportedly
replied, "If those six had Miss Price, it stands to reason that the
others
had Miss Bates." When one of the accused,
Clarence Norris, called the girls liars he was struck by a
bayonet.
A crowd of several hundred men, hoping for a good old-fashioned
lynching,
surrounded the Scottsboro jail the night of their arrest for
rape.
Their plans were foiled, however, when Alabama's governor, B. M.
Miller,
ordered the National Guard to Scottsboro to protect the suspects.
Trials of the Scottsboro Boys began twelve days after their
arrest in
the courtroom of Judge A. E. Hawkins. Haywood Patterson
described
the scene as "one big smiling white face." Many local newspapers
had made their conclusions about the defendants before the trials
began.
One headline read: "ALL NEGROES POSITIVELY IDENTIFIED BY GIRLS AND ONE
WHITE BOY WHO WAS HELD PRISONER WITH PISTOL AND KNIVES WHILE NINE BLACK
FIENDS COMMITTED REVOLTING CRIME." Representing the Boys in their
uphill legal battle were Stephen Roddy and Milo Moody. They were no
"Dream
Team." Roddy was an unpaid and unprepared Chattanooga real estate
attorney who, on the first day of trial, was "so stewed he could hardly
walk straight." Moody was a forgetful seventy-year old local
attorney
who hadn't tried a case in decades.
The defense lawyers demonstrated their incompetence in many
ways.
They expressed a willingness to have all nine defendants tried
together,
despite the prejudice such a trial might cause to
Roy Wright, for example, who at age twelve was the youngest of the
nine Scottsboro Boys. (The prosecution, fearing that a single
trial
might constitute reversible error, decided to try the defendants in
groups
of two or three.) The cross-examination of Victoria Price
lasted
only minutes, while examining doctors R. R. Bridges and John Lynch were
not cross-examined at all. Ruby Bates was not asked about
contradictions
between her testimony and that of Price. The defense offered only
the defendants themselves as witnesses, and their testimony was
rambling,
sometimes incoherent, and riddled with obvious misstatements. Six
of the boys (Andy Wright, Willie Roberson, Charles Weems, Ozie Powell,
Olen Montgomery, and Eugene Williams) denied raping or even having seen
the two girls. But three others, all who later claimed they did
so
because of beatings and threats, said that a gang rape by other
defendants
did occur. Clarence Norris provided what one paper called "the
highlight
of the trial" when he said of the other blacks, "They all raped her,
everyone
of them." No closing argument was offered by defense attorneys. A
local editorialist described the state's case as "so conclusive as to
be
almost perfect."
Guilty verdicts in the first trial were announced while the
second trial
was underway. The large crowd outside the courthouse let out a
roar
of approval that was clearly heard by the second jury inside. When the
four trials were over, eight of the nine Scottsboro Boys had been
convicted
and sentenced to death. A mistrial was declared in the case of
twelve-year
old Roy Wright, when eleven of the jurors held out for death despite
the
request of the prosecution for only a life sentence in view of his
tender
age.
The NAACP, which might have been expected to rush to the
defense of
the Scottsboro Boys, did not. Rape was a politically explosive
charge
in the South, and the NAACP was concerned about damage to its
effectiveness
that might result if it turned out some or all of the Boys were
guilty.
Instead, it was the Communist Party that moved aggressively to make the
Scottsboro case their own. The Party saw the case as providing a
great recruiting tool among southern blacks and northern
liberals.
The Communist Party, through its legal arm, the International Labor
Defense
(ILD), pronounced the case against the Boys a "murderous frame-up" and
began efforts, ultimately successful, to be named as their
attorneys.
The NAACP, a slow-moving bureaucracy, finally came to the realization
that
the Scottsboro Boys were most likely innocent and that leadership in
the
case would have large public relations benefits. As a last-ditch
effort to beat back the ILD in the battle over representation, NAACP
officials
persuaded renowned defense attorney Clarence
Darrow to take their case to
Alabama.
But it was by then too late. The Scottsboro Boys, for better or
worse,
cast their lots with the Communists who, in the South, were "treated
with
only slightly more courtesy than a gang of rapists."
In January, 1932, the Alabama Supreme Court, by a 6 - 1
vote, affirmed
all but one of the eight convictions and death sentences. (The
court
ruled that Eugene Williams, age thirteen, should have not been tried as
an adult.) The cases were appealed to the United States Supreme
Court
which overturned the convictions in the landmark case of Powell
vs Alabama. The Court, 7 - 2, ruled that the
right
of the defendants under the Fourteenth Amendment's due process clause
to
competent legal counsel had been denied by Alabama. There would
have
to be new trials.
The prosecutor in the retrials was Alabama's newly elected
attorney
general, Thomas
Knight, Jr. Knight's father, Thomas Knight, Sr., had authored
the Alabama Supreme Court decision upholding the original convictions.
The ILD selected two attorneys to represent the Scottsboro
Boys in the
retrials. The ILD quieted skeptics who saw the organization
caring
more about the benefits it could derive from the case than the Boys'
welfare
by asking Samuel
Leibowitz to serve as the lead defense attorney. Leibowitz
was
a New York criminal attorney who had secured an astonishing record of
seventy-seven
acquittals and one hung jury in seventy-eight murder trials.
Liebowitz
was often described as"the next Clarence Darrow." Liebowitz was a
mainline
Democrat with no connections with or sympathies toward the Communist
Party.
Joseph Brodsky, the ILD's chief attorney, was selected to assist
Leibowitz.
The Scottsboro Boys spent the two years between their first
trials and
the second round, scheduled to begin in March, 1933 in Decatur, in the
deplorable conditions of Depression-era Alabama prisons. While on death
row at Kilby prison, on the very date originally set for their own
executions,
they watched as another inmate was carried off to unsoundproofed death
chamber adjacent to their cells, then listened to the sounds of his
electrocution.
Once or twice a week they were allowed to leave their tiny cells, as
they
were handcuffed and walked a few yards down the hall to a shower. An
early
visitor found them "terrified, bewildered" like "scared little mice,
caught
in a trap."(LINK
TO UNPUBLISHED 1931 RANSDALL REPORT). They fought, they
wrote
letters if they could write at all, they thought about girls and life
on
the outside, they dreamed of their executions. As their trial
date
approached, they were moved to the Decatur jail, a rat-infested
facility
that two years earlier had been condemned as "unfit for white
prisoners."
The second trial of Haywood Patterson opened on March 30,
1933, in the
courtroom of
Judge James Horton. Leibowitz moved to quash the indictments
on the ground that Negroes had been systematically excluded from jury
rolls.
He raised some eyebrows by questioning the veracity of local jury
commissioners
and many more when he insisted that prosecutor Knight stop his practice
of calling black witnesses, who Leibowitz had called to show had never
served on juries, by their first names. To many local observers
it
was one thing to defend rapists-- that, after all, is part of the
American
justice system--, but it was another, unforgivable thing to come to
Alabama
and attack their social order and way of life. Unsurprisingly,
the
motion to quash the indictment was denied.
On April 3, Victoria ("Big Leg") Price was called to
the stand.
Direct examination was brief, only sixteen minutes. Price
recounted
her job-hunting trip to Chattanooga, the fight on the train between
whites
and blacks, and the gang rape in which Haywood Patterson was one of her
attackers. Prosecutor Knight's strategy on direct was to cover the
essential
facts in a condensed, unadorned way that would provide few
opportunities for defense attorneys to expose contradictions with the
more
detailed (and implausible) story she told in the first trials.
Leibowitz's
cross-examination was merciless. His questions suggested his
answers.
There was no Callie Brochie's boardinghouse in Chattanooga, as Price
claimed.
She was an adulterer who had consorted with Jack Tiller in the
Huntsville
freight yards two days before the alleged rape, and it was his semen
(or
that of Orville Gilley) that was found in her vagina. She was a
person
of low repute, a prostitute. She was neither crying, bleeding, or
seriously bruised after the alleged gang rape. She was fearful of
being arrested for a Mann Act violation (crossing state lines for
immoral
purposes) when she met the posse in Paint Rock, so she and Bates made
groundless
accusations of rape to deflect attention from their own sins.
Thoughout
the four-hour cross, Price remained sarcastic, evasive, and
venomous.
She used her ignorance and poor memory to her advantage and proved to
be
a difficult witness to corner. On re-direct, Price added a new
dramatic
and inflammatory elaboration to her previous account: while she was
being
penetrated, she said, her attacker told her that when he pulled his
"thing"
out, "you will have a black baby."(LINK
TO PRICE TESTIMONY).
Dr.
R. R. Bridges, the Scottsboro doctor who examined the girls less
than
two hours after the alleged rapes, was the next prosecution witness to
take the stand. He turned out to be a better witness for the
defense.
He did confirm that semen was found in the vaginas of the two girls
(more
in the case of Bates than of Price). Leibowitz,
however,
was able to show on cross-examination that the girls were both
calm,
composed, and free of bleeding and vaginal damage. Moreover, the
semen that Bridges examined was non-motile, even though sperm generally
live from twelve to forty-eight hours after intercourse. (LINK
TO BRIDGES TESTIMONY).
The prosecution's best moment came when Arthur Woodall, a
member of
the posse who searched the defendants at Paint Rock, was on the
stand.
Woodall testified that he had found a knife on one of the defendants,
though
he couldn't remember which one. Leibowitz asked Woodall if he had
asked the boy whether it was his knife. Woodall said that he had,
and that the boy said he had taken it "off the white girl, Victoria
Price."
The surprised look on Leibowitz's face caused Knight to clap his hands
and then dash out of the courtroom to hide his glee. Liebowitz moved
for
a mistrial, but Judge Horton denied the motion and instead told jurors
they should ignore Knight's reaction.(LINK
TO WOODALL TESTIMONY).
The prosecution's only eyewitness to the crime was a farmer
named Ory
Dobbins who said he saw the defendants grab Price and Bates as they
were
about to leap from the train. The credibility of the farmer's
testimony
was seriously damaged by Leibowitz on cross, when he asked how it was
that
Dobbins could even be sure, given the speed of the train and his
considerable
distance from it, that it was a woman that he saw. Dobbins
answered, "She was wearing women's clothes." Everyone who had
followed
the case knew that Bates and Price both were wearing overalls.
"Are
you sure it wasn't overalls or a coat?," Judge Horton asked. "No
sir, a dress," Dobbins said.
(LINK
TO DOBBINS TESTIMONY).
Defense witnesses were all called to serve a single purpose:
to prove
Price a liar and convince the jury that no rape had occurred aboard the
Southern Railroad freight. Dallas Ramsey, a Chattanooga
resident,
testified that he saw Price in the hobo jungle she denied ever having
visited.(LINK
TO RAMSEY TESTIMONY). George
Chamlee, a Chattanooga attorney, testified that his investigation could
turn up no evidence of a Callie Brochie or the boardinghouse that Price
said she owned, and in which Price and Bates allegedly spent the night
prior to her return train trip to Alabama.
(LINK TO CHAMLEE TESTIMONY).Six
of the accused testified, including Willie
Roberson, who testified that on the day of the alleged rape he was
suffering from a serious case of venereal disease and was so weak that
he could not walk without a cane, let alone leap from boxcar to boxcar
as Price had claimed.(LINK
TO ROBERSON TESTIMONY). Ozie Powell proved the weakest of
the
accused on the stand, confused and bewildered when asked by Knight on
cross
to affirm or disaffirm answers he had given to prosecution questions at
the first trial. In an attempt to minimize the damage, Leibowitz
asked only, when Knight's barrage was finished, "Ozie tell us about how
much schooling you have had in your life?" Powell answered,
"about
three months." (LINK
TO POWELL TESTIMONY). Knight had considerably less
luck
with Haywood Patterson. In desperation Knight asked Patterson,
"Were
you tried in Scottsboro?" Patterson replied, "I was framed in
Scottsboro."
An angry Knight shot back, "Who told you to say that?" Patterson
answered, "I told myself to say it".(LINK
TO PATTERSON TESTIMONY).
Lester Carter, the twenty-three-year-old traveling companion
of Bates
and Price, was one of the defense's most spectacular witnesses.
Carter,
who Price had denied having known until the day of the alleged crime,
testified
that he had met Bates, Price, and Prices' boyfriend Jack Tiller in a
Huntsville
hobo jungle the night before he would travel with the two girls to
Chattanooga.
He told the jury that the night the four were together in the hobo
jungle,
and while he began making love to Ruby Bates while Price did the same
with
Tiller. Carter testified that two days later, on the return trip
to Hunstville from Chattanooga, he jumped off the freight train when
fighting
broke out between blacks and the outnumbered whites. (LINK
TO CARTER TESTIMONY).
The appearance of the defense's final and most dramatic
witness, Ruby
Bates, might have been taken from the script of a hokey Hollywood
movie.
In the months before the trial, Bates' whereabouts were a
mystery.
Leibowitz announced that he was resting his case, then approached the
bench
and asked for a short recess. Minutes later National Guardsmen
open
the back doors of the courtroom, and-- to the astonished gasps of
spectators
and the dismay of Knight-- in walked Ruby Bates. Under direct
examination,
Bates said a troubled conscience and the advice of famous New York
minister
Harry Emerson Fosdick prompted her to return to Alabama to tell the
truth
about what happened on March 25, 1931. Bates said that there was
no rape, that none of the defendants touched her or even spoke to her,
and that the accusations of rape were made after Price told her "to
frame
up a story" to avoid morals charges. On cross-examination, Knight
ripped into Bates, confronting her both with her conflicting testimony
in the first trials and accusations that her new versions of events had
been bought with new clothes and other Communist Party gifts. He
demanded to know whether he hadn't told her months before in his office
that he would "punish anyone who made her swear falsely" and that he
"did
not want to burn any person that wasn't guilty." "I think you
did,"
Bates answered.
(LINK
TO BATES TESTIMONY)
In the summations that followed, none was more controversial
than that
of Wade Wright, Solicitor of Morgan County, who was assisting Attorney
General Knight in the prosecution. In a line that would move
thousands
of Jews around the country to protest, Wright asked the Patterson
jurors
"whether justice in this case is going to be bought and sold with Jew
money
from New York?" Leibowitz jumped up and demanded a mistrial, which
Judge
Horton refused to declare. Knight seemed to be embarrassed by his
colleague's blatantly anti-Semitic appeal and in his own summation told
the jurors, "I do not want a verdict based on racial prejudice or
religious
creed." Knight, however, was himself no model of decorum, referring to
Patterson as "that thing."
Leibowitz, in his summation, called the accusations of Price
the "foul,
contemptible, outrageous lie" of an "abandoned" woman. He closed
with the Lord's Prayer and an all-or-nothing appeal to the jury: acquit
them or give them the chair.
At one o'clock on April 8, 1933, the jury was sent out to
deliberate
the fate of Haywood Patterson after Judge Horton reminded the jury that
"You are not trying lawyers; you are not trying state lines." The
next day the jury emerged from the jury room laughing, leading some in
the defense camp to think that they must have won an acquittal.
They
were wrong. The jury pronounced Patterson guilty and sentenced
him
to death. The decision on guilt took only five
minutes.
The testimony of Bates wasn't even considered. Leibowitz was
stunned.
Safely back in New York after the trial Leibowitz said of the jury that
had just found his client guilty: "If you ever saw those creatures,
those
bigots whose mouths are slits in their faces, whose eyes popped out at
you like frogs, whose chins dripped tobacco juice, bewhiskered and
filthy,
you would not ask how they could do it." Ruby Bates returned East with
Leibowitz, then became the leading lady at ILD-sponsored Scottsboro
rallies,
where she would beg forgiveness, plead for justice for "The Boys," and
join in singing The Internationale.
On June 22, 1933, Judge James Horton, described as looking
like "Lincoln
without the beard," convened court in his hometown of Athens, Alabama
to
hear a defense motion for a new trial. Hardly anyone held out
hope
that the motion would be granted. Horton, however, had become
convinced
that Price was lying. Not only was her story full of
inconsistencies,
but it was not corroborated by other witnesses or the medical
evidence.
Judge Horton had one additional reason to believe that Patterson was
innocent
that remained a secret until years after the trial. After Dr.
Bridges
presented his medical testimony, the prosecution had requested that Dr.
John Lynch, originally listed as a prosecution witness, be excused from
testifying. His testimony would only be redundant, according to
Knight.
After Horton excused the young doctor, he was approached by Lynch who
said
he wanted to talk privately. Horton and Lynch talked in the
courthouse
men's bathroom while armed guards stood outside the door. Lynch
told
Horton he was convinced that the girls were lying, had told them so to
their faces, and that they merely laughed at him. Horton urged
Lynch
to testify, but Lynch, only a few years out of medical school and just
building a practice in Scottsboro, resisted, saying that to do so would
ruin his career. Sympathizing with Lynch's predicament, Horton
withdrew
his demand. Judge Horton, who had to face re-election the next
year,
had been warned that setting aside the jury's verdict in this case
would
be political suicide. Horton, however, believed one should "let
justice
be done, though the heavens may fall." To a stunned courtroom, he
announced that he was setting aside the verdict and death sentence, and
ordering a new trial.(LINK
TO HORTON DECISION) (Horton, who was unopposed the
previous
time he ran, lost his judgeship in the next election.)
Attorney General Knight wasted no time in announcing that
the state
was convinced of the Scottsboro Boys' guilt and would press ahead with
prosecutions. At the next trial, Knight promised, there would be
corroboration for Price's story. Orville Gilley, the one white
boy
left on the train when the alleged rapes took place, had agree to
testify
for the prosecution. The prosecution had one additional ground for
optimism.
Pressure in the right places had succeeded in getting the new trials
transferred
out of Judge Horton's courtroom.
William Callahan, a septuagenarian, no nonsense judge, would
preside
at Haywood Patterson's next trial, scheduled for November, 1933.
Judge Callahan was no Judge Horton. His stated goal
was "to debunk"
the Scottsboro cases-- to get them off the front pages of America's
newspapers. (LINK
TO STORIES ON CALLAHAN TRIALS). To cut the trials down to
size,
he made it as difficult as possible for reporters to do their job,
refused
to ask for troops to protect the defendants or their attorneys, and set
three days as a goal for completing each trial. During the trials
he acted more like a second prosecutor than a judge, sustaining
virtually
every prosecution objection and overruling virtually every
defense
objection. He cut off all defense inquiry into Price's chastity,
character, or reputation. When Leibowitz persisted with questioning
designed
to suggest Price might have had sex with someone other than a
Scottsboro
Boy around March 25, 1931, Callahan sternly reprimanded him. In
his
instructions to the jury, Callahan told them that they should presume
that
no white woman in Alabama would consent to sex with a black. At
the
close of his instructions in the Patterson trial, Callahan failed to
provide
the jury with the form for an acquittal until the prosecution, fearing
reversible error, urged him to do so. Patterson said of Callahan,
"He couldn't get me to the chair fast enough."
The undisputed star of the third Patterson trial, and the
second Norris
trial which immediately followed, was Orville Gilley. Gilley was a
charming
and entertaining witness, even offering to recite some of his poetry
until
the dour Callahan cut him off, saying "I don't like poetry."
Gilley's
account of the onboard fight and rape differed in many details from
that
of Price, but he corroborated her on the essential fact. Gilley
claimed
that the rapes ended only when he convinced the Negroes to stop before
"they killed that woman." Why did Gilley suddenly appear as a
prosecution
witness when they most needed him? Knight admitted that he sent
weekly
checks to Gilley's mother and occasional spending money to
Gilley.
Leibowitz contended that Gilley's reluctant lies were simply a result
of
the prosecutor calling in his chips.
Guilty verdicts were quickly returned by juries in both the
Patterson
and Norris trials.(LINKS TO
NORRIS
TRIAL TESTIMONY: (1)
PRICE
(2) BRIDGES
(3)
BATES). Both defendants were sentenced to death.
Leibowitz angrily promised to appeal the verdicts "to Hell and
back."
Judge Callahan, in the interest of judicial economy, agreed to postpone
the trials of the remaining seven Scottsboro Boys until the appeals of
the first two had run their course.
On February 15, 1935, the United States Supreme Court heard
arguments
in the Patterson and Norris cases. Leibowitz argued that the
convictions
should be overturned because Alabama excluded blacks from its jury
rolls
in violation of the equal protection clause of the Constitution.
The names of blacks that appeared on the jury rolls introduced in Judge
Callahan's courtroom were, Leibowitz told the justices, forged sometime
after the start of Patterson's trial. Chief Justice Charles Evans
Hughes asked Leibowitz if he could prove that allegation.
Leibowitz
had a page bring in the actual jury rolls and a magnifying glass.
Hughes looked at the rolls, then passed it to the next seated justice,
who then passed it to the next. Looks of disgust appeared on
their
faces. Six weeks later the Supreme Court announced their decision
in Norris
vs. Alabama, unanimously holding that the Alabama system of
jury
selection unconstitutional and reversing the convictions of Norris and
Patterson. Leibowitz said, "I am thrilled beyond words." He
hoped that the Court's decision would convince Alabama that the
Scottsboro
cases were no longer worth their economic and political cost.
The state decided to press ahead with prosecutions as the
defense tried
to deal with its own internal problems. Two ILD lawyers in
Nashville
were arrested and charged with trying to bribe Victoria Price to change
her testimony, infuriating Leibowitz, who said the ILD was
"assassinating"
the Scottsboro Boys. Leibowitz, meanwhile, was under criticism
himself
for having through his actions at previous trials alienated potential
jurors.
As Haywood Patterson's fourth trial began in January, 1936, in Judge
Callahan's
courtroom, Leibowitz agreed to let a local attorney named Charles Watts
play the more visible role while he coached from a seat behind.
No surprise to anyone, Patterson was again convicted of
rape.
What was surprising, however, was that the jury sentenced him to
seventy-five
years in prison rather than giving him the death sentence the
prosecution
requested. One determined Methodist on the jury succeeded in
persuading
the other eleven to go along with his "compromise." The verdict
represented
the first time in the history of Alabama that a black man convicted of
raping a white woman had not been sentenced to death.
Another surprising development occurred as the Scottsboro
Boys, who
had been in Decatur to testify in Patterson's trial, were being
transported
by guards back to their Birmingham prison.
Ozie Powell, while handcuffed in the backseat of a car, managed to
extract a pen knife from a pocket and slash the neck of a deputy
sheriff,
seriously injuring him. The sheriff, who was driving, slammed on
the brakes, got out of the car, and shot Powell in the head. The
sheriff called Powell's action an escape attempt. Powell said he took
the
action out of a growing fear that they would be murdered on the road,
and
complained that his hands were raised in the air when he was
shot.
Powell teetered on the verge of death, but survived. He suffered
permanent brain damage, however. According to Clarence Norris,
Powell
was never the same again.
In 1936 there was the first serious talk of compromise in
what had become,
in the eyes of many, the case of The White People of Alabama vs.
The
Rest of the World. Allan Knight Chalmers, head of the
Scottsboro
Defense Committee, eschewed diatribe and worked to build an
understanding
of the facts of the case among influential Alabamians by, for example,
distributing copies of Judge Horton's decision throughout the
state.
In December of 1936, while Patterson's appeal was still pending and the
other eight blacks awaited their trials, Thomas Knight met secretly
with
Samuel Leibowitz in New York to discuss a compromise. Knight told
Leibowitz that the cases were draining Alabama financially and
politically,
and that he himself was sick of it all. He offered to drop the
prosecutions
of three, and give the others no more than ten years for either rape or
assault. Leibowitz was understandably reluctant to accept any deal that
included more jail time time for any of his innocent clients, but
Knight
had a strong bargaining position: guilty or not, any trial was almost
certain
to result in conviction. Leibowitz agreed to the compromise "with
a heavy heart." Before it could be implemented, however, the
compromise
was thrown into doubt by the sudden death of Thomas Knight in May,
1937.
One week later, Judge Callahan announced that the next round of trials
would begin in July.
Seven of the nine Scottsboro Boys had been held in jail for
over six
years without trial by the time jury selection began in the third trial
of Clarence Norris on Monday, July 12, 1937. Trying to beat the
hundred
degree heat, Judge Callahan rushed the trial even more than usual, and
by Wednesday morning the prosecution had a death sentence. Andy
Wright's
trial was next; he got ninety-nine years. On Saturday, July 24 at
eleven o'clock, Charlie
Weem's jury returned and gave him seventy-five years. Moments
later,
Ozie Powell was brought into court and the new prosecutor, Thomas
Lawson,
announced that the state was dropping rape charges against Powell and
that
he was pleading guilty to assaulting a deputy. Then came the big
news. Lawson announced that all charges were being dropped
against
the remaining four defendants: Willie Roberson, Olen
Montgomery, Eugene
Williams, and Roy Wright. He said that after "careful
consideration"
every prosecutor was "convinced" that Roberson and Montgomery were "not
guilty." Wright and Williams, regardless of their guilty or
innocence,
were twelve and thirteen at the time and, in view of the jail time they
had already served, justice required that they also be released.
Leibowitz
led the four from the jail to an awaiting car, and with an escort of
state
troopers they were driven to the Tennessee border. (LINK
TO PHOTO OF LIEBOWITZ AND FOUR AFTER RELEASE). Free of
Alabama,
but not of the label "Scottsboro Boy" or from the wounds inflicted by
six
years in prison, they went on with their separate lives: to marriage,
to
alcoholism, to jobs, to fatherhood, to hope, to disillusionment, to
disease,
or to suicide.
For the five Scottsboro Boys left in Alabama, they had a new
demon with
which to contend. Each of the five was convinced that their
continued
confinement bought the freedom of the others, and they resented it
deeply.
They struggled with life in hellholes of prisons. Atmore Prison,
near Mobile, was a desperate place teeming with poisonous snakes,
sadistic
guards, and rapacious prisoners. Kilby Prison, near Birmingham,
housed
Alabama's electric chair; one of Haywood Patterson's jobs was to carry
out the bodies of electrocuted inmates. They sodomized or were
sodomized;
they assaulted or were assaulted. They survived, but barely.
In 1938, a pardon for all of the Scottsboro Boys left in
Alabama seemed
all but assured. Governor
Bibb Graves was anxious to end the whole Scottsboro episode before
he left office, and told Scottsboro Defense Committee head Allan
Chalmers
that the five would be released after he had his traditional pre-pardon
interviews with each in his office. The interviews, however,
could
hardly have gone worse. First, Haywood Patterson was found to be
carrying a knife when he was searched on his way to the
interview.
Patterson claimed he always carried a knife for protection, but
authorities
assumed the worst. Second, brain-damaged Ozie Powell refused to
answer
Graves questions, saying "I don't want to say nothing to you."
Third,
according to Graves' account, Clarence Norris threatened to kill
Haywood
Patterson, with whom he had been feuding bitterly, after his
release.
Finally, none of the Scottsboro Boys admitted any knowledge or guilt
concerning
a rape aboard the Chattanooga to Memphis freight--a rape that Graves
still
believed occurred. Graves left office without issuing the pardons.
Either through paroles or escapes all of the Scottsboro Boys
eventually
found their way out of Alabama. Charles Weems was paroled in
1943,
Ozie Powell and Clarence Norris in 1946, and Andy
Wright, the last to leave Alabama for good (Wright had been paroled
earlier, then returned because of a parole violation) in June,
1950.
Haywood Patterson managed a dramatic escape in 1948. Patterson
and
Norris each went on to participate in the writing of books about their
lives. Patterson's book, Scottsboro Boy, was published
in
1950 while he was a fugitive. Shortly after its publication,
Patterson
was arrested by the FBI, but the Governor G. Mennen Williams of
Michigan
refused Alabama's extradition request. Norris published his book,
The
Last of the Scottsboro Boys, in 1979. Ten years later, on
January
23, 1989, the last of the Scottsboro Boys was dead.
The story of the Scottsboro Boys lives on through the
efforts of artists
and scholars. Leadbelly recorded a song, "Scottsboro Boys." (LINK
TO AUDIO CLIP FROM SONG). Dan T. Carter published his
award-winning Scottsboro: A Tragedy of the American South in
1969.
A movie, Judge Horton and the Scottsboro Boys, was shown on NBC
in 1976. ( One inaccuracy in Carter's book was relied on to the movie
producer's
detriment: Carter reported that Ruby Bates and Victoria Price had died
in 1961, when in fact at the time of the movie's release they were both
alive and well, and Victoria Price at least was ready to sue for
defamation.
Her suit was dismissed by a federal appeals court.) (LINK
TO INFORMATION ABOUT PRICE'S CIVIL SUIT). James
Goodman published Stories of Scottsboro, a superb
recounting
of the Scottsboro tragedy from multiple perspectives, in
1994.
At this writing, in October, 1998, a new documentary on the Scottsboro
Boys is in production.
The story of the Scottsboro Boys is one of the most shameful
examples
of injustice in our nation's history. It makes clear that in the
Deep South of the 1930's, jurors were not willing to accord a black
charged
with raping a white woman the usual presumption of innocence. In
fact, one may argue that the presumption seemed reversed: a black was
presumed
guilty unless he could establish his innocence beyond a reasonable
doubt.
The cases show that to jurors, black lives didn't count for much.
The jurors that in April, 1933 had just voted to sentence Haywood
Patterson
to death were seen laughing as they emerged from the juryroom.
Hannah
Arendt wrote of "the banality of evil." Evil rarely comes in the
form of monsters, but rather in the form of relatively normal people
who,
for reasons of careers, ideology, or a desire for society's
approval,
are indifferent to the human consequences of their actions.
Because
of indifferent jurors and career-motivated prosecutors, the
self-serving
and groundless accusations of a single woman were allowed to change
forever
the lives of nine black teenagers who found themselves in the wrong
place
at the wrong time.
It is easy, especially for a Minnesota native like myself,
to look at
the story of the Scottsboro Boys and to condemn a whole region of the
country.
That, however, is unfair. There were good people of the
South--courageous
newspaper editors, attorneys, ministers, and others-- who fought for
justice
for the Scottsboro Boys. One southerner's actions stand out above all
others.
The decision of Judge James Horton to set aside the conviction of
Haywood
Patterson, despite the dire consequences that decision would have for
his
own career, was heroism, pure and simple.